Top 10 Security Awareness Training Platforms in 2026 

Human error remains the leading cause of security incidents, which is why security awareness training is now a standard best practice across industries. Organizations typically deploy a combination of phishing simulations and structured training modules to reduce click-through rates, mitigate risky behavior, and meet compliance requirements. 

This guide compares ten widely used security awareness training solutions, using a consistent format for quick evaluation and easy reference. 

Last reviewed: February 2026 

Security awareness training platforms comparison 2026 phished vs competitors

How to evaluate security awareness training 

Security awareness platforms typically differ in four key areas: 

  • Behavior change: Does the anti-phishing training measurably reduce click-through rates and risky behavior over time?

  • Human risk categories: Can IT and SOC teams identify high-risk employees and high-value targets, and apply risk-based training and protective measures accordingly?

  • Operational workload: How much ongoing effort is required to set up and manage campaigns, handle phishing-related workload, and generate reporting?

  • In-the-moment support: Does the platform train, coach, and protect employees within their daily workflows? 

1. Phished: Eliminating incidents caused by human error 

Phished is an AI-driven security awareness platform that combines interactive cybersecurity training with patented zero-trust email technology. Their approach helps companies move toward a zero-incident rate by preventing incidents caused by human error and unreliable spam filters. The Phished holistic platform also eliminates all phishing-related workload for the IT team. 


What it does 

Phished focuses on differentiated learning paths for high-risk employees, first-time clickers, and high-target roles. The platform combines: 

  • Realistic, behavior-driven phishing simulations with positive reinforcement that teach employees how to recognize malicious emails and threats

  • A structured, end-to-end learning curriculum covering cybersecurity topics such as password security, AI usage, remote work risks, data handling, HR-related cybersecurity, compliance, and more

  • Actionable cyber hygiene practices that guide employees in securing their accounts, devices, applications, and daily digital habits

  • Real-time threat alerts that keep employees informed about active threats, emerging attack techniques, and relevant industry developments

  • Progress is quantified through the Behavioral Risk Score™ and dashboards, for both IT and management, that track resilience at individual, team, and organizational levels. 


The Phished Assistant: Personal SOC Center for each employee 

Phished includes a Phished Assistant, a personal cybersecurity coach in the employee’s inbox that provides 24/7 support. Employees can report simulations, malicious emails, spam, or potential incidents and receive immediate AI-driven analysis—without requiring IT intervention. There are no waiting times, and employees can act independently. 


Capabilities include: 

  • Report simulations: Automatically deletes simulations from the inbox after reporting and delivers interactive learning feedback for coaching on the spot.

  • Report malicious emails: AI-powered analysis and automated email handling without IT intervention

  • Report spam and unsubscribe: Automated email handling without IT involvement

  • Report potential incidents: User interaction is reported with full integration into incident response workflows 


Pros of Phished 

  • Risk-based training tailored by user profile

  • Behavioral Risk Score™ for measurable, board-ready reporting

  • Anti-phishing training fully integrated with zero-trust email security

  • Security awareness training designed to eliminate IT workload 


Cons of Phished 

  • Teams seeking a content-library-only tool may not fully leverage the model

  • Best outcomes require combining security awareness training with email protection—not simulations alone 

2. KnowBe4: Large & well-known, sometimes complex to manage 

KnowBe4 is widely adopted and known for its extensive content library and program tooling, which can benefit organizations seeking a broad range of training assets and templates. 


Pros of KnowBe4 

  • Extensive content library with frequent updates

  • Benchmarking and reporting suited for mature programs

  • Large ecosystem of integrations and partners 


Cons of KnowBe4 

  • Large, purchased content libraries that are continually expanded over time can lead to inconsistent curricula

  • Scientific research indicates that simulation-based training produces limited long-term behavioral change (see also: Black Hat 2025

3. Proofpoint security awareness: threat data at the core 

Proofpoint emphasizes human risk management informed by threat intelligence, positioning training and simulations as part of a broader strategy to identify high-risk individuals and reduce exposure. 


Pros of Proofpoint 

  • Alignment with threat intelligence for timely scenarios and program focus

  • Explicit focus on identifying high-risk individuals and measuring human risk

  • Strong fit for large organizations already standardized on Proofpoint  


Cons of Proofpoint 

  • Some teams may prefer more prevention-first coaching workflows over incident-adjacent program designs

  • Reports may need to be adjusted for non-security stakeholders, depending on how the program is implemented. 

4. SoSafe: AI-driven and personalized 

SoSafe highlights personalized, behavior-based simulations and awareness training informed by behavioral science and adaptive mechanics.  


Pros of SoSafe 

  • Personalization by role and behavior for greater relevance

  • Gamified, story-based training designed to reduce the learning fatigue

  • Adaptive difficulty based on user performance 


Cons of SoSafe 

  • Gamification may feel overly playful for some corporate cultures

  • Organizations seeking built-in protective controls may require additional security layers 

5. Riot Security: Emerging, AI-first program automation 

Riot positions itself around rapid deployment, automated campaigns, and low-maintenance phishing simulation workflows. 


Pros of Riot Security 

  • Practical phishing training with automated targeting to reduce administrative overhead

  • Integrations supporting synchronization across common collaboration tools

  • Additional features such as hotline and breach alerts (depending on the plan) 


Cons of Riot Security 

  • Because their AI-generated content can lack depth, some buyers may look for stronger evidence of scalability, robust reporting, and program maturity.

  • Strong focus on the French market 

6. Cofense: Specialist in Phishing Response 

Cofense is best known for phishing defense and response workflows, with integrated tools such as a report button to help employees report suspicious emails.  


Pros of Cofense 

  • Strong reporting and response workflows

  • Designed for organizations prioritizing phishing triage and SOC integration

  • Phishing-specific threat analysis that feeds directly into incident response 


Cons of Cofense 

  • Organizations focused on long-term behavior change for their employees may seek deeper coaching capabilities

  • Awareness may be secondary to response, depending on program design 

7. Mimecast awareness training: Short & Accessible 

Mimecast emphasizes rapid deployment and concise training content paired with phishing simulations. 


Pros of Mimecast 

  • Phishing simulations built for fast setup and repeatable campaign execution

  • Short, engaging training videos that are easy to roll out at scale

  • Good fit for establishing and maintaining baseline security awareness 


Cons of Mimecast 

  • Teams seeking advanced behavioral analytics and risk scoring will need additional tools

  • Long-term culture-building programs may need deeper segmentation and reinforcement 

8. Abnormal: Threat-driven awareness 

Abnormal is best known for AI-native email security, and extends into awareness with an AI Security Mailbox—turning real attacks seen in your environment into relevant simulations, just-in-time training, and automated handling of employee-reported emails. 


Pros of Abnormal 

  • Training and simulations informed by real attack patterns targeting the organization 

  • Just-in-time coaching after user failure to reinforce learning in context 

  • Automation for employee-reported email triage to reduce SOC/IT workload 


Cons of Abnormal 

  • Less non-phishing content variety compared with other tools 

  • Analytics/reporting can feel more SOC-centric than management-ready 

9. Hoxhunt: Gamification with personalization 

Hoxhunt positions its platform around personalized, gamified training and automation designed to measurably reduce risky behavior over time.  


Pros of Hoxhunt 

  • Gamified approach that can boost engagement and completion rates

  • Adaptive, personalized simulations and training based on user behavior

  • Strong focus on behavior-based metrics such as reporting rate and time-to-report 


Cons of Hoxhunt 

  • Can create significant ongoing administrative workload for IT and security teams

  • Often emphasizes identifying failures over proactive, preventive coaching that helps users avoid future mistakes 

10. Fable Security 

Fable Security positions itself as an automation-first phishing awareness platform, focused on continuous phishing simulations, behavioral nudges, and minimal administrative overhead. 


Pros of Fable Security 

  • Automated phishing campaigns requiring minimal setup and ongoing management

  • Continuous, bite-sized learning instead of sporadic training

  • Simple deployment and user-friendly interface suited for lean security teams  


Cons of Fable Security 

  • Primarily phishing-focused, with less breadth across broader cybersecurity topics

  • More limited advanced risk scoring and enterprise-level analytics compared to larger platforms 

Conclusion  

Security awareness platforms are converging on the same outcome—reducing human risk—but they still differ in how they get there. Some prioritize content volume, others focus on threat intelligence, personalization, gamification, response workflows, or professional skill development. 

For organizations aiming to measurably reduce incidents caused by human error, the strongest programs typically combine: 

  • Training that stays relevant, practical, and easy to complete 

  • Clear visibility into risk through meaningful, decision-ready metrics 

  • In-the-moment support that helps employees verify, report, and act safely inside daily workflows 


Phished’s approach—interactive training plus Behavioral Risk Score™ measurement, paired with protective support through Zero Incident Mail™ (ZIM) and the Phished Assistant—is built to connect awareness directly to operational risk reduction and a lower incident rate.